It is currently Sat May 25, 2019 2:52 am


Announcement: Registrations are currently disabled. Apologies for any inconvenience caused.

The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

From discussing the nature of the control system to space phenomena, theorize away.
  • Author
  • Message
Offline
User avatar

enkidu2368

Praetor-

Registered User

3 stars

  • Posts: 1247
  • Joined: 27 February 2013
  • Location: Britannia-
  • Thanks Received: 285

The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostThu Apr 17, 2014 10:56 pm

Image

'The EU: The Truth About The Fourth Reich - How Hitler Won The Second World War' argues the single currency, the free market and even the phrase "United States of Europe" were all dreamt up by high ranking Nazis, including the Fuhrer himself.

It also claims the only country which benefits from the EU is Germany - just as Hitler planned.

A spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats - which its leader Nick Clegg describes as the "party of in" when it comes to the EU - dismissed the authors of the book as "peddling outlandish myths".

The book, co-written by Daniel J Beddowes and Falvio Cipollini, says: "What is the EU for? Who really benefits? And the answer is of course Germany.

"It is no coincidence that just about every country in the European Union is getting poorer while Germany continues to get richer and richer.

"We may think we won the Second World War. But we lost. It is no surprise that we are all living in the Fourth Reich.

"Knowingly or not those who support and defend the European Union are supporting the Nazi legacy."

Under a chapter heading 'The EU was inspired an designed by Nazis', the authors claim: "Hitler was the man who gave bones to the dreams first expressed by Charlemagne and Napoleon but the finishing touches to the EU as we know it were put in place during World War II by a man called Walther Funk, who was President of the Reichsbank and a director of the Bank for International Settlements.

"It was Funk who predicted the coming of European economic unity. Funk was also Adolf Hitler's economics minister and his key economics advisor."

It continues: "The Nazis wanted to get rid of the clutter of small nations which made up Europe and their plan was quite simple. The EU was Hitler's dream."

The book argues it is no coincidence that the EU is so close to Hitler's plan for post-war Europe.

According to the authors: "In 1945, Hitler's Masterplan was captured by the Allies. The Plan included details of his scheme to create an economic integration of Europe and to found a European Union on a federal basis.

"The Nazi plan for a federal Europe was based on Lenin's belief that 'federation is a transitional form towards complete union of all nations'.

"It is impossible to find a difference between Hitler's plan for a new United States of Europe, dominated by Germany, and the European Union we have today."

The book also claims Conservative Prime Minister Ted Heath - "a self-confessed liar and a traitor" - was paid £35,000 to take Britain into the European Economic Community in 1973 and Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels would be proud of the BBC's support of the EU.

The final part of the book lists "73 things you ought to know about the EU (Facts the BBC forgot to tell you)".

In amongst concerns about immigration and the Common Agricultural Policy, the authors argue "The EU is making DIY illegal", "EU law forces pig owners to apply for walking licences" and "The EU wants to control the music you listen to".

It also claims: "The EU has forced us to use light bulbs which are more dangerous and more expensive than the old ones.

"The first problem with the new EU light-bulbs is that the light produced by them is so poor that people have difficulty seeing where they are going - let alone being able to see well enough to read or work."

According to the book, European Commission vice-president Viviane Reding crystallised "Hitler's dream, Hitler's words" earlier this year when she "called for a 'true political union' and a campaign for the European Union to become a 'United States of Europe'."

A Liberal Democrat spokesperson said: “People have been peddling outlandish myths about the EU for decades and this book is an example of that. Some of the suggestions made are completely ludicrous. Winston Churchill called for a “United States of Europe” and I doubt the author would call him a Nazi.

“The Liberal Democrats want Britain to stay in the EU because we are fighting for a stronger economy – fighting to defend millions of British jobs which are linked to our trade with the EU.

"Being in Europe gives us more strength when negotiating trade deals with global players on the world stage.”

It is not the first time the EU has been described as a German plot to take over Europe.

In 1990, Cabinet Minister Nicholas Ridley - a close ally of Margaret Thatcher - was forced to resign after he described proposed Economic and Monetary Union as "a German racket designed to take over the whole of Europe" and said that giving up sovereignty to the European Union was as bad as giving it up to Hitler.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/470967/The-EU-was-HITLER-S-idea-and-it-proves-Germany-WON-the-Second-World-War-claims-new-book
...this world is only play and amusement, pomp and mutual boasting among you, and rivalry in respect of wealth and children, as the likeness of vegetation after rain, thereof the growth is pleasing to the tiller; afterwards it dries up and you see it turning yellow; then it becomes straw. Al-Hadid (020)
Offline

Atzmonelli

Registered User

1 star

  • Posts: 151
  • Joined: 24 October 2014
  • Thanks Received: 17

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostSun Oct 26, 2014 1:23 pm

The premise of the book is nonsense. Hitler and the National Socialists were the arch nemesis of Jewry.

Communism is a Jewish ideology to the core. The US has been run by Jews since 1913 (Federal Reserve created by German Jews - Warburgs, Schiffs, Rockefellers (Rothschilds) etc), and since around the later 1930s, the US has been run by communist jews. The communist Jews came in when war criminal Mr Rosenfeld (Dutch Jew Roosevelt) installed them (Banuch etc) for his war - WWII. WWII was an ideological battle between Nationalism and Communism / Marxism. The Jewish controlled Churchill war-mongered with Rosenfeld and sided with the Bolshevik Jews in the Soviet Union to destroy Nationalist Germany. The German economic miracle of the 30s which printed it's own currency with no Jewish controlled central bank and no fractional reserved lending supported by the industrial might of Germany was the biggest orchestrated threat to organized Jewry probably in history.

Rosenfeld's criminal administration armed the Soviets to the hilt.

"Neocons" are Bolsheviks, stemming from Chicago, Leo Strauss, is their ideological father, a Jew.

The other wing of organized Jewry, the "liberals", are cultural marxists of the Frankfurt School, a Jewish weapon to destroy Europe's nations, peoples and cultures.

The US was lost to Jews 100 years ago.

Allied denazification after WWII destroyed the National Socialists massacring 3 million Germans and forcing 11 million to relocate in the biggest forced relocation in history. On top of that German IP was plundered by the Allies in the biggest IP theft in history.

The EU is Bolshevik. The OP is fallacious and is just typical Jewish behavior and lies of projecting their own behavior on to their enemy.
Offline

sarah

Registered User

3.5 Stars

  • Posts: 1509
  • Joined: 02 June 2013
  • Thanks Received: 478

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostSun Oct 26, 2014 6:05 pm

This is what I have trouble understanding, many high-level Nazis were smuggled out of Germany near or at the end of the war, including Hitler imo but I digress, the Nazis were funded and helped by secret society organizations such as Skull and Bones..ie Prescott Bush and company.. also "during Project Paperclip the United States pardoned thousands of Nazi scientists and workers found safe haven at the end of WWII often being given high-profile government jobs."

..the Nazi Party was funded by "Morgan, Rockefeller, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, (the Jewish) Kuhn, Loeb and Company, General Motors, Ford, and other industrialists".. (Many of these Rothschild agent managed companies.)
http://www.thehiddenevil.com...

"Operation Paperclip was the codename under which the US intelligence and military services extricated scientists from Germany, during and after the final stages of World War II. The project was originally called Operation Overcast, and is sometimes also known as Project Paperclip."
http://www.operationpaperclip.info/

Allen Dulles delivered the Nazi Intelligence unit to the CIA, which later opened many umbrella projects stemming from Nazi research. (MK-ULTRA / ARTICHOKE, OPERATION MIDNIGHT CLIMAX)

Skull and Bones/Russell Trust and company (who helped fund Hitler and the Nazis) are STILL extremely dangerous and powerful forces to be reckoned with today with members being placed in such positions as President of the United States, head of CIA etc and many other powerful positions. Nazis or ex-Nazis have also been entwined with the Bilderbergs with the co-founder having been a member of the Nazi SS, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld).

The 'Jewish' Rothschild's and other extremely powerful 'Jewish' elites have also attended the Bilderberg meetings and are involved in the same circles.

The US has been run by Jews since 1913 (Federal Reserve created by German Jews - Warburgs, Schiffs, Rockefellers (Rothschilds) etc), and since around the later 1930s


The other wing of organized Jewry, the "liberals", are cultural marxists of the Frankfurt School, a Jewish weapon to destroy Europe's nations, peoples and cultures.


^^also true...

So perhaps at the very highest still truly hidden levels there is something so diabolical going on that it is hard to wrap our heads around. If you have 'Nazi' elites and 'Jewish' elites working in tandem seemingly towards the same goals then it is good to follow any and all paths in which the two (and more) intersect.




.
Offline

Atzmonelli

Registered User

1 star

  • Posts: 151
  • Joined: 24 October 2014
  • Thanks Received: 17

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostSun Oct 26, 2014 10:13 pm

Hi Sarah.

Thanks for the replies. There are two aspects of what you've raised in your post that I will address:

1. Germany's economic strategy
2. Allied denazification.

They are lengthy issues so I'll tackle them one at a time.

With regard to Germany’s record, Galbraith wrote: “… The elimination of unemployment in Germany during the Great Depression without inflation -- and with initial reliance on essential civilian activities -- was a signal accomplishment. It has rarely been praised and not much remarked. The notion that Hitler could do no good extends to his economics as it does, more plausibly, to all else.”

The Hitler regime’s economic policy, Galbraith goes on, involved “large scale borrowing for public expenditures, and at first this was principally for civilian work -- railroads, canals and the Autobahnen [highway network]. The result was a far more effective attack on unemployment than in any other industrial country.” / 1 “By late 1935,” he also wrote, “unemployment was at an end in Germany. By 1936 high income was pulling up prices or making it possible to raise them … Germany, by the late thirties, had full employment at stable prices. It was, in the industrial world, an absolutely unique achievement.” / 2 “Hitler also anticipated modern economic policy,” the economist noted, “by recognizing that a rapid approach to full employment was only possible if it was combined with wage and price controls. That a nation oppressed by economic fears would respond to Hitler as Americans did to F.D.R. is not surprising.” / 3

Other countries, Galbraith wrote, failed to understand or to learn from the German experience: “The German example was instructive but not persuasive. British and American conservatives looked at the Nazi financial heresies -- the borrowing and spending -- and uniformly predicted a breakdown … And American liberals and British socialists looked at the repression, the destruction of the unions, the Brownshirts, the Blackshirts, the concentration camps, and screaming oratory, and ignored the economics. Nothing good [they believed], not even full employment, could come from Hitler.” / 4

Two days after taking office as Chancellor, Hitler addressed the nation by radio. Although he and other leaders of his movement had made clear their intention to reorganize the nation’s social, political, cultural and educational life in accord with National Socialist principles, everyone knew that, with some six million jobless and the national economy in paralysis, the great priority of the moment was to restore the nation’s economic life, above all by tackling unemployment and providing productive work.

“The misery of our people is horrible to behold!,” said Hitler in this inaugural address. / 5 “Along with the hungry unemployed millions of industrial workers there is the impoverishment of the whole middle class and the artisans. If this collapse finally also finishes off the German farmers we will face a catastrophe of incalculable dimension. For that would be not just the collapse of a nation, but of a two-thousand-year-old inheritance of some of the greatest achievements of human culture and civilization …”

The new government, Hitler said, would “achieve the great task of reorganizing our nation’s economy by means of two great four-year plans. The German farmer must be rescued to maintain the nation’s food supply and, in consequence, the nation’s vital foundation. The German worker will be saved from ruin with a concerted and all-embracing attack against unemployment.”

“Within four years,” he pledged, “unemployment must be decisively overcome … The Marxist parties and their allies have had 14 years to show what they can do. The result is a heap of ruins. Now, people of Germany, give us four years and then pass judgment upon us!”

Rejecting the cloudy and impractical economic views of some radical activists in his Party, Hitler turned to men of proven ability and competence. Most notably, he enlisted the help of Hjalmar Schacht, a prominent banker and financier with an impressive record in both private business and public service. Even though Schacht was certainly no National Socialist, Hitler appointed him President of Germany’s central bank, the Reichsbank, and then as Minister of Economics.

After taking power, writes Prof. John Garraty, a prominent American historian, Hitler and his new government “immediately launched an all-out assault on unemployment … They stimulated private industry through subsidies and tax rebates, encouraged consumer spending by such means as marriage loans, and plunged into the massive public-works program that produced the autobahn [highway system], and housing, railroad and navigation projects.” / 6

The regime’s new leaders also succeeded in persuading formerly skeptical and even hostile Germans of their sincerity, resolve and ability. This fostered trust and confidence, which in turn encouraged businessmen to hire and invest, and consumers to spend with an eye to the future.

As he had promised, Hitler and his National Socialist government banished unemployment within four years. The number of jobless was cut from six million at the beginning of 1933, when he took power, to one million by 1936. / 7 So rapidly was the jobless rate reduced that by 1937-38 there was a national labor shortage. / 8

For the great mass of Germans, wages and working conditions improved steadily. From 1932 to 1938 gross real weekly earnings increased by 21 percent. After taking into account tax and insurance deductions and adjustments to the cost of living, the increase in real weekly earnings during this period was 14 percent. At the same time, rents remained stable, and there was a relative decline in the costs of heating and light. Prices actually declined for some consumer goods, such as electrical appliances, clocks and watches, as well as for some foods. "Consumer prices rose at an average annual rate of just 1.2 percent between 1933 and 1939," notes British historian Niall Ferguson. "This meant that Germans workers were better off in real as well as nominal terms: between 1933 and 1938, weekly net earnings (after tax) rose by 22 percent, while the cost of living rose by just seven percent." Even after the outbreak of war in September 1939, workers’ income continued to rise. By 1943 average hourly earnings of German workers had risen by 25 percent, and weekly earnings by 41 percent. / 9

The “normal” work day for most Germans was eight hours, and pay for overtime work was generous. / 10 In addition to higher wages, benefits included markedly improved working conditions, such as better health and safety conditions, canteens with subsidized hot meals, athletic fields, parks, subsidized theater performances and concerts, exhibitions, sports and hiking groups, dances, adult education courses, and subsidized tourism. / 11 An already extensive network of social welfare programs, including old age insurance and a national health care program, was expanded.

Hitler wanted Germans to have “the highest possible standard of living,” he said in an interview with an American journalist in early 1934. “In my opinion, the Americans are right in not wanting to make everyone the same but rather in upholding the principle of the ladder. However, every single person must be granted the opportunity to climb up the ladder.” / 12 In keeping with this outlook, Hitler’s government promoted social mobility, with wide opportunities to improve and advance. As Prof. Garraty notes: “It is beyond argument that the Nazis encouraged working-class social and economic mobility.” To encourage acquisition of new skills, the government greatly expanded vocational training programs, and offered generous incentives for further advancement of efficient workers. / 13

Both National Socialist ideology and Hitler’s basic outlook, writes historian John Garraty, “inclined the regime to favor the ordinary German over any elite group. Workers … had an honored place in the system.” In accord with this, the regime provided substantive fringe benefits for workers that included subsidized housing, low-cost excursions, sports programs, and more pleasing factory facilities. / 14

In his detailed and critical biography of Hitler, historian Joachim Fest acknowledged: “The regime insisted that it was not the rule of one social class above all others, and by granting everyone opportunities to rise, it in fact demonstrated class neutrality … These measures did indeed break through the old, petrified social structures. They tangibly improved the material condition of much of the population.” / 15

A few figures give an idea of how the quality of life improved. Between 1932, the last year of the pre-Hitler era, and 1938, the last full year before the outbreak of war, food consumption increased by one sixth, while clothing and textile turnover increased by more than a quarter, and of furniture and household goods by 50 percent. / 16 During the Third Reich’s peacetime years, wine consumption rose by 50 percent, and champagne consumption increased five-fold. / 17 Between 1932 and 1938, the volume of tourism more than doubled, while automobile ownership during the 1930s tripled. / 18 German motor vehicle production, which included cars made by the US-owned Ford and General Motors (Opel) works, doubled in the five years of 1932 to 1937, while Germany’s motor vehicle exports increased eight-fold. Air passenger traffic in Germany more than tripled from 1933 to 1937. / 19

http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html

On Tuesday, September 24th, 2013 Deanna Spingola interviewed Rodney Martin who debunked a Veterans Today article by Anthony Migchels entitled “Hitler’s Finances and the Myth of Nazi Anti-Usury Activism” which has been widely circulated on various alternative media sites within the “half-truth movement” to keep the kool-aid drinkers  sedated, dumbed down and dis-informed, and unable to see, much less accept the fact the Hitler and the NSDAP opposed the Bankster Gangsters and their system of usury, and that National Socialism was the solution to the New World Order agenda.

Who would not want the world to know that? Moreover, who would have a vested interest in keeping the so-called “truth movement” from accepting that fact, and keeping them perpetually demonizing Hitler and “evil Nazis”?  Who has a vested interest in keeping “truth seekers” going down rabbit holes that go nowhere?  It merely keeps certain “truther gurus” in a position to keep repeating their hysterical mantras, and to keep their reputations and fear mongering strategies afloat, which enables them to rake in cash from their books and DVDs etc, and no doubt, even more cash from their handlers. Who ultimately benefits? What agenda is served?

By the way, Anthony Migchels’ article is virtually un-sourced.  He merely adds some related links at the bottom and pretends that his diatribe is authoritative. About the only thing he sources is from the Jewish Virtual Library where they quote Schacht, as if they are not a biased source? Mr. Migchels apparently also believes in “Nazis”. There was never any such thing.  They exist only in the imagination and rantings of ignorant people who love to hate National Socialism and to bash people around who are no longer here to defend themselves. His use of that term speaks to his bias.


Image

Under the National Socialists, Germany’s money wasn’t backed by gold (which was owned by the international bankers). It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the government.

Hitler said, “For every mark issued, we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done, or goods produced.”

The government paid workers in Certificates. Workers spent those Certificates on other goods and services, thus creating more jobs for more people. In this way the German people climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the international bankers.

Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and Germany was back on its feet. It had a solid, stable currency, with no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the United States and other Western countries (controlled by international bankers) were still out of work. Within five years, Germany went from the poorest nation in Europe to the richest.

Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the international bankers’ denial of foreign credit to Germany, and despite the global boycott by Jewish-owned industries. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system that cut the bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.

Economist Henry C K Liu writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation:

“The Nazis came to power in 1933 when the German economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.” (Henry C. K. Liu, “Nazism and the German Economic Miracle,” Asia Times (May 24, 2005).

In Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984), Sheldon Emry commented:

“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”

These facts do not appear in any textbooks today, since Jews own most publishing companies. What does appear is the disastrous runaway inflation suffered in 1923 by the Weimar Republic, which governed Germany from 1919 to 1933. Today’s textbooks use this inflation to twist truth into its opposite. They cite the radical devaluation of the German mark as an example of what goes wrong when governments print their own money, rather than borrow it from private cartels.  Source:  How Hitler Defied the Bankers   (based on Web of Debt by Ellen Brown)

http://justice4germans.com/2013/09/25/d ... and-usury/
Offline

Atzmonelli

Registered User

1 star

  • Posts: 151
  • Joined: 24 October 2014
  • Thanks Received: 17

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostSun Oct 26, 2014 10:23 pm

The National Socialists Gave Rothschild Bankers The Boot

December 5, 2013

Despite the frivolous claims of foolhardy patriotards and assorted Jew defenders who often masquerade as “anti- Zionists,” the National Socialistss were not — in any way — covertly funded by, or in cahoots with, Rothschild bankers. On the contrary, the German, French and Austrian branches of the House of Rothschild were effectively dissolved and extirpated by Hitler. Quite a bizarre and counterproductive action of a “Rothschild agent” wouldn’t you say?

Niall Ferguson’s biography of the Rothschild family, The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World’s Banker: 1849-1999 (Penguin, 2000), although sympathetic to Jewry and the Rothschilds, outlines the reality of the National Socialists’ war against this international criminal Jewish banking cabal. Ferguson writes:

“An altogether more ruthless coalition had come to power in Germany in 1933, dominated by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Hostility to the Rothschilds’ had been a feature of National Socialist propaganda from the movement’s infancy (see introduction to volume 1) despite the fact that the Frankfurt house had been wound up when Hitler was barely twelve years old. It was a hostility that soon translated into action. At first the attacks were largely symbolic: in December 1933 the Frankfurt Rothschildallee was renamed Karolingerallee, while the Luisenplatz and Mathildenstrasse lost the plaques identifying them with members of the family. It was not until April 1938, with the “Ordinance on the Registration of Jewish Assets,” that Rothschild property came under direct attack. In the wake of the orchestrated anti-Semitic demonstrations of the following November (Reichskristallnacht), nearly all the myriad of charitable and educational foundations — of which there were around twenty — were dissolved, with the exception of the Carolinum Dental Clinic, which had become part of the Frankfurt University. The largest of these, the Baron Wilhelm Carl von Rothschild Foundation, was “Aryanised” under pressure from the city authorities, so that all references to its founder were expunged. At the same time, the Reich Association of Jews in Germany was forced to sell the Mathilde von Rothschild Paediatric Hospital, the Georgine Sara von Rothschild Foundation for Infirm Foreign Israelites and the Rothschild residence at Grosser Wollgraben 26 to the Frankfurt municipality. The Gestapo also confiscated the A.M. von Rothschild Sanatorium for Lung Diseases in the Black Forest. At least four other Rothschild-founded institutions suffered the same fate."

The private property of the few family members still resident in Germany was expropriated by similar methods, though there was in fact relatively little of it left by 1938. Before the process of confiscation began, Max von-Goldscmidt-Rothschild’s son Albert, Rudolf and Erich sold the family houses at the Grüneburg and Königstein and opted to emigrate (Albert to Switzerland, where he committed suicide in 1941 when faced with the threat of expulsion). But Maximilian — now 95 — was too old to leave. He stayed on in the house in the Bockenheimer Landstrasse, with the garden which his wife’s great-uncle Amschel had acquired over a century before the earliest days of Jewish emancipation in Frankfurt. Or rather he was allowed to occupy a room in the house; for in tragic fulfilment of Amschel’s nightmare — dating back to the night in 1815 when he first slept in the “free air” of the garden — Maximilian was forced to sell the property to the city of Frankfurt for just 610,000 reichsmarks (less tax). In the aftermath of Kristallnacht he was also obliged to sell his art collection to the city for 2.3 million reichsmarks (again less tax) and to donate a further 25 percent of his remaining assets to the Reich as an “atonement payment”…

… Discovered, was no longer the Vienna house by the Alliance. In addition, the Witkowitz board had safeguarded against sequestration the company’s stake in the Swedish Freya ore mines as well as £200,000 in foreign currency. Louis [Nathaniel de Rothschild of Austria] therefore had a real bargaining position. When Himmler sought to ingratiate himself by sending some ornate French furniture to the prison, he was able to send it away complaining that it made his cell look like a “Cracow Bordello.” Although Louis had to hand over most of his Austrian assets to secure his own release, the family was able to insist that a price be paid for Witkowitz (albeit a discounted price). But such legal niceties were ultimately bound to be swept aside by National Socialist force majeure. Eugene’s hopes of selling the ironworks to the Czechoslovak state for £10 million were dashed when Hitler bullied the Prague government into accepting partition in March 1939. With the works effectively under German control, Goring’s Commissioner Hans Kehrl, Rasche and Paul Pleiger (the Reichswerke’s general director). At the same time Fritz Kranefuss — Himmler ’s adjutant and a supervisory board member of the Dresdner bank — informed Rasche on the basis of Sicherheitsdienst intelligence that the transfer abroad of the ownership of Witkowitz had been illegal under currency laws. Finally, in July 1939, it was agreed to sell the plant for £2.9 million. However, the outbreak of war gave the Germans the perfect excuse not to pay. As a result, Witkowitz joined the lengthening list of Rothschild properties confiscated without compensation by the National Socialist regime. In January 1941 Goring was able to take the process a step further when 43,300 Witkowitz shares were seized from the vaults of the Paris house (though even this did not give him a technical controlling interest). (It was not until 1953 that the communist government established in Czechoslovakia in 1948 finally paid compensation to the Rothschilds — amounting to £1 millon — for the works.) Yet it was not their industrial investments which Hitler and his lackeys really coveted so much as their investments in art — the Old Masters, the Sevres, the Louis Quinze bureaus— which were the most dazzling fruits of the family’s financial success. In fleeing Austria, Alphonse had left behind one of the great European private collections; and attempts to buy it by Lord Duveen (possibly bidding on behalf of the original owners) were in vain. For the acquisition of so many old masters had given Hitler the idea of establishing a new German gallery at Linz, to give the Reich its Louvre. In 1939 he authorized Hans Posse to begin work on the project, putting the best works seized from Austrian Jews into a “Fuhrer reserve” for this purpose. …

Up until the outbreak of war in 1939, the corollary of the expropriation of the Jews was their emigration from German territory. (It was significant in this respect that the Rothschild palace in the Prinz Eugenstrasse was occupied by Adolf Eichmann’s Central Office for Jewish Emigration, which worked closely with Rafelsberger ’s Asset Transactions Office.) Naturally many (though not all) German and Austrian Jews wanted to get out, while the National Socialists had no objection to their leaving, provided they could be mulcted in the process. Leading German Jewish bankers — notably Max Warburg — saw little alternative but to facilitate this process. However, for Jews like the Rothschilds who remained outside the area of German control, this created a number of acute dilemmas. …
Read more
http://www.worldtruth.org/mobile/blog/1 ... imefactor/
Offline

Atzmonelli

Registered User

1 star

  • Posts: 151
  • Joined: 24 October 2014
  • Thanks Received: 17

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostSun Oct 26, 2014 11:55 pm

http://youtu.be/14oXz16QeCA

This video is worth watching. Hitler was very popular in Germany with Germans.

The NSDAP was supported by 80% of the German population. The demonization of him and his party is purely propaganda to smear the most organized assault on international jewry and threat to Jewish controlled fractional reserve lending in history.

Who controls Hollywood and can fund and produce product to state the contrary?

The National Socialists sat outside the duopoly we have had imposed on us by (Jewish) Democracy.

The party was established as a necessary reaction to WWI and the extremely punitive destruction imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles.

If Hitler and the NSDAP didn't come along someone else would have.

You need to look at WWII as an extension of WWI. ie, WWI never ended but had a 25 hiatus.

Germany was strongly winning WWI until the US became involved and the British / French were about to be defeated. German Jewish bankers from NY were funding Germany to the hilt as they hated the Tsar (for Jewish containment policies) and wanted Russia defeated.

Britain sought Jewish funding. The Jews double crossed Germany and hung it out to dry. NY Jews turned off the money to Germany funded the UK and brought the US into the war. The price was Israel. Hence the Balfour Declaration was written to Lord Rothschild.

The extreme reparations imposed on Germany by Versailles required it to repay the damages done to the victors. That amounted to $3bn. Germany was economically crippled and had to borrow at usurious rates from largely Jewish bankers. In addition Germany had 1/3 of its land mass taken from it and subject to Allied occupation for 25 years. The Allies were in yhe pockets of and funded by Jewish warmongers who wanted an other World War.

The Treaty of Versailles made that a certainty.

The German Finance Minister in the 20s who was tasked with restructuring Germany's economy looked at the state of play in Germany and asked "how can it be that the total value of Germany's economic capital is $12bn yet the wealth of one family, the Rothschilds, is $40bn?"

Then you have the shocking treatment inflicted on stranded German population in Poland in particular.

The Jewish controlled Allies made WWII a certainty.
Offline

Atzmonelli

Registered User

1 star

  • Posts: 151
  • Joined: 24 October 2014
  • Thanks Received: 17

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostWed Nov 12, 2014 12:55 pm

The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan was the plan of ethnic genocide of the European peoples by mass immigration. He was the father of the EU and was sponsored by Jews. His plan was written down in a book in 1925, called "Praktischer Idealismus"

Today's races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. The main representatives of the brain aristocracy: of capitalism, journalism and the literate are Jews. The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility.

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Richard_Coudenhove-Kalergi
Offline

Atzmonelli

Registered User

1 star

  • Posts: 151
  • Joined: 24 October 2014
  • Thanks Received: 17

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostWed Nov 12, 2014 1:48 pm

He was a mason and was financially supported by the German Jew Bankster Warburg Family (Fed Family) after being introduced by Lord Rothschild (same ilk but wealthier and more powerful).

His first book, titled Pan-Europa was published in 1923, contained a membership for supported for the Pan-Europa movement. Coudenhove-Kalergi's movement held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. In 1927 Aristide Briand was elected honorary president. Personalities attending included: Albert Einstein, Thomas Mann and Sigmund Freud.[3]

He was the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize in 1950. The 1972–1973 academic year at the College of Europe was named in his honour. Coudenhove-Kalergi proposed Beethoven's Ode to Joy as the music for the European Anthem. He also proposed a Europe Day, European postage stamp[4] and so many goods for his movement (e.g. badges and pennants).[5]

Coudenhove-Kalergi is recognized as the founder of the first popular movement for a united Europe. His intellectual influences ranged from Rudolf Kjellén and Oswald Spengler to Arthur Schopenhauer andFriedrich Nietzsche. In politics, he was an enthusiastic supporter of "fourteen points" made by Woodrow Wilson on 8 January 1918 and pacifist initiatives of Kurt Hiller. Through the ritual in December 1921, he joined theMasonic lodge "Humanitas" in Vienna in 1922, where he would reach several degrees.[12] In 1922, he co-founded[citation needed] the Pan-European Union (PEU) with Archduke Otto von Habsburg, as "the only way of guarding against an eventual world hegemony by Russia".[13] In 1923, he published a manifesto entitled Pan-Europa, each copy containing a membership form which invited the reader to become a member of the Pan-Europa movement. He favored social democracy as an improvement on "the feudal aristocracy of the sword" But his ambition was to create a conservative society that superseded democracy with "the social aristocracy of the spirit".[14] European freemason's lodges supported his movement, including the lodge Humanitas.[15]

According to his autobiography, at the beginning of 1924 he came through Baron Louis de Rothschild in contact with Max Warburg who offered to finance his movement for the next 3 years giving him 60,000 gold marks; Warburg eventually remained sincerely interested in the movement for his entire life and served as an intermediate man as to bring him in contact with influential personalities in America such as banker Paul Warburg and financierBernard Baruch accompanying him there. In April 1924 Coudenhove-Kalergi founded the journal Paneuropa (1924-1938) of which he was editor and principal author. The next year he started publishing his main work, theKampf um Paneuropa (The fight for Paneuropa, 1925-1928, three volumes). In 1926, the first Congress of the Pan-European Union was held in Vienna and the 2,000 delegates elected Coudenhove-Kalergi as president of the Central Council a position he held until his death (1972).

His original vision was for a world divided into only five states: a United States of Europe that would link continental countries with French and Italian possessions in Africa; a Pan-American Union encompassing North and South Americas; the British Commonwealth circling the globe; the USSR spanning Eurasia; and a Pan-Asian Union whereby Japan and China would control most of the Pacific. To him, the only hope for a Europe devastated by war was to federate along lines that the Hungarian-born Romanian Aurel Popovici and others had proposed for the by then just dissolved multinational Empire of Austria-Hungary. According to Coudenhove-Kalergi, Pan-Europe would encompass and extend a more flexible and more competitive Austria-Hungary, with English serving as world language, spoken by everyone in addition to his native tongue. He believed that individualism and socialism would learn to cooperate instead of compete, and urged that capitalism and communism cross-fertilize each other just as the Protestant Reformation had spurred the Catholic Church to regenerate itself.[16]

Coudenhove-Kalergi attempted to enlist prominent European politicians in his pan-European cause. He offered the presidency of the Austrian branch of the Pan-European Union to Ignaz Seipel, who accepted the offer unhesitatingly and rewarded his beneficiary with an office in the old Imperial palace in Vienna. Coudenhove-Kalergi had less success with Tomáš Masaryk, who referred him to his uncooperative Prime MinisterEdvard Beneš. The idea of pan-Europe elicited support from politicians as diverse in their orientation as Carlo Sforza and Hjalmar Schacht. Although Coudenhove-Kalergi found himself unable to sway Benito Mussolini, his ideas influenced Aristide Briand and his inspired speech in favor of a European Union in the League of Nations on 8 September 1929, as well as his famous 1930 "Memorandum on the Organization of a Regime of European Federal Union".[17] He proposed the Beethoven's "Ode to Joy" as the Anthem of Europe in 1929[4] ahead of his proposal in 1955. In 1930, he proposed a Europe Day in May[4] and in 1932 he proposed to celebrate the Day every 17th May when Aristide Briand's "Memorandum" was published in 1930.[18] Meanwhile, his Pan-Europeanism earned vivid loathing from Adolf Hitler, who excoriated its pacifism and mechanical economism and belittled its founder as "everybody's bastard",[19] or "cosmopolitan bastard".[20] Hitler thought that the rootless, cosmopolitan, and elitist half-breed Coudenhove-Kalergi was going to start the historical mistakes of Coudenhove ancestors' who had served Habsburg, again, continentally.[21] In 1928, Hitler wrote about the hateful political opponent in his Zweites Buch, describing as "Allerweltsbastarden Coudenhove",[22][23] and in 1961, the book was on sale.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_ ... ve-Kalergi
Offline

leconnaisseur

Registered User

1.5 stars

  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 06 March 2013
  • Thanks Received: 63

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostFri Nov 14, 2014 5:45 pm

Atzmonelli wrote:http://youtu.be/14oXz16QeCA

This video is worth watching. Hitler was very popular in Germany with Germans.

The NSDAP was supported by 80% of the German population. The demonization of him and his party is purely propaganda to smear the most organized assault on international jewry and threat to Jewish controlled fractional reserve lending in history.

Who controls Hollywood and can fund and produce product to state the contrary?

The National Socialists sat outside the duopoly we have had imposed on us by (Jewish) Democracy.

The party was established as a necessary reaction to WWI and the extremely punitive destruction imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles.

If Hitler and the NSDAP didn't come along someone else would have.

You need to look at WWII as an extension of WWI. ie, WWI never ended but had a 25 hiatus.

Germany was strongly winning WWI until the US became involved and the British / French were about to be defeated. German Jewish bankers from NY were funding Germany to the hilt as they hated the Tsar (for Jewish containment policies) and wanted Russia defeated.

Britain sought Jewish funding. The Jews double crossed Germany and hung it out to dry. NY Jews turned off the money to Germany funded the UK and brought the US into the war. The price was Israel. Hence the Balfour Declaration was written to Lord Rothschild.

The extreme reparations imposed on Germany by Versailles required it to repay the damages done to the victors. That amounted to $3bn. Germany was economically crippled and had to borrow at usurious rates from largely Jewish bankers. In addition Germany had 1/3 of its land mass taken from it and subject to Allied occupation for 25 years. The Allies were in yhe pockets of and funded by Jewish warmongers who wanted an other World War.

The Treaty of Versailles made that a certainty.

The German Finance Minister in the 20s who was tasked with restructuring Germany's economy looked at the state of play in Germany and asked "how can it be that the total value of Germany's economic capital is $12bn yet the wealth of one family, the Rothschilds, is $40bn?"

Then you have the shocking treatment inflicted on stranded German population in Poland in particular.

The Jewish controlled Allies made WWII a certainty.


That's very true. They chose to fuck over Germany after WW1. The final insult was the occupation of the Ruhr. That crippled the German, who already took the blame and footed the ill for WW1. They occupied the last industrial territory te german had and ruined it for two years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Ruhr

The Ruhr region had been occupied by Allied troops in the immediate aftermath of the First World War, during the Occupation of the Rhineland (1918–1919). Under the terms of the Treaty of Versailles (1919), which formally ended the war, Germany admitted responsibility for starting the war and was obliged to pay war reparations to the various Allies, principally France. The total sum of reparations demanded from Germany—around 226 billion gold marks (US $846 billion in 2014)—was decided by an Inter-Allied Reparations Commission. In 1921, the amount was reduced to 132 billion (at that time, $31.4 billion (US $442 billion in 2014), or £6.6 billion (UK £284 billion in 2014)).[1] Even with the reduction, the debt was huge. As some of the payments were in industrial raw materials, German factories were unable to function, and the German economy suffered, further damaging the country's ability to pay.[2]

By late 1922, the German defaults on payments had grown so regular that a crisis engulfed the Reparations Commission; the French and Belgian delegates urged occupying the Ruhr as a way of forcing Germany to pay more, while the British delegate urged a lowering of the payments.[3] As a consequence of a German default on timber deliveries in December 1922, the Reparations Commission declared Germany in default, which led to the Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr in January 1923.[4] Particularly galling to the French was that the timber quota the Germans defaulted on was based on an assessment of their capacity the Germans made themselves and subsequently lowered.[5] The Allies believed that the government of Chancellor Wilhelm Cuno had defaulted on the timber deliveries deliberately as a way of testing the will of the Allies to enforce the treaty.[5] The entire conflict was further exacerbated by a German default on coal deliveries in early January 1923, which was the thirty-fourth coal default in the previous thirty-six months.[6] The French Premier Raymond Poincaré was deeply reluctant to order the Ruhr occupation and took this step only after the British had rejected his proposals for non-military sanctions against Germany.[7] Frustrated at Germany not paying reparations, Poincaré hoped for joint Anglo-French economic sanctions against Germany in 1922 and opposed military action. However by December 1922 he was faced with Anglo-American-German opposition and saw coal for French steel production and payments in money as laid out in the Treaty of Versailles draining away. Poincaré was exasperated with British opposition, and wrote to the French ambassador in London....
Offline

leconnaisseur

Registered User

1.5 stars

  • Posts: 364
  • Joined: 06 March 2013
  • Thanks Received: 63

Re: The E.U was Hitler's Idea (new book)

PostFri Nov 14, 2014 5:56 pm

Concerning OP:

"The Nazi plan for a federal Europe was based on Lenin's belief that 'federation is a transitional form towards complete union of all nations'.

The question is who tought Lenin to think like that...

The answer is quite obvious:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/2 ... 66098.html

Among dozens of newly released documents on display at the State History Museum is a letter written by Lenin's eldest sister, Anna Ulyanova, saying that their maternal grandfather was a Ukrainian Jew who converted to Christianity to escape the Pale of Settlement and gain access to higher education.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks

The Bolsheviks were the majority faction in a crucial vote, hence their name. They ultimately became the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.[6] The Bolsheviks came to power in Russia during the October Revolution phase of the Russian Revolution of 1917, and founded the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic which would later become the chief constituent of the Soviet Union in 1922.

Full circle. So it was not Hitler's idea, but Lenin's idea.

Also I think that the way Germany was directly by the City and Wall Street is by selling bonds on the market that they never meant to repay. Who was buying german bonds in the 1930s at the height of the great depression? Who bought those who were emitted in 1940?

Quote:
It started in the 1920’s when Germany issued series of bearer bonds in the USA for revitalisation of its economy following the devastating effects of WWI. Acting as trustees, financial institutions such as JP Morgan and Lee Higgins & Co. produced and sold bonds in America raising funds that would be invested in Germany.

See, JP was already there. And the british governement was there to help:

The way this deal would function was to provide the option to the bondholders of German debt, to either accept the repayment terms of the LDA, or to forego attempts to claim their debt until 1993. The rationale being, that you can cash in today from a weak Germany, or wait for a full settlement after 40 years of German growth and development.

Those who were not in the loop are still looking for that money.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/0 ... 06742.html

So it support the fact that the world was shaped after WW2 by The Axis Germany - Uk( Isreal) and US, cause except those three countries, the other did not default on those bonds. Also after WW2, more money was sent to rebuild Germany then to rebuild the UK.
Next

Return to Theories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron